Blog #6:
How would an Athenian of the 5th Century BCE criticize our present-day representative democracy? (or.... how would they approve of it?)
An Athenian from the 5th century would criticize or approve of our democracy based on where they sit as an individual. It could also be based on a more general part of their democracy. Their direct democracy is a lot different then our representative democracy. Two examples of this are, one something that has nothing to do with their title, voting laws. Two they have no middle man. No legislators or senators to pass or veto their votes.
Their voting laws had stated that a slave, women or anyone under 18 could not vote. The “ You have to be over 18 to vote” law still aplys, but we don't have slaves and women rights have changed a lot. Someone in higher power wouldn't like to see that there are no slaves and any man would not like seeing women with rights. Although, a women would very much like the opportunity to voice her opinion and a slave like seeing no slaves. Like I said it depends where you stand.
Although different individuals have different points of view, a representative democracy is something that affects everyone equal (at least people who can vote). It is already hard for us to see our decisions being decided a second time in a different way. Athenians would have trouble understanding why there decision was being ignored instead of falling through. Having a direct democracy os much simpler then a representative one.